Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

DI-based TypeHierarchy #623

Closed
2 tasks
fabianbs96 opened this issue May 29, 2023 · 0 comments · Fixed by #702
Closed
2 tasks

DI-based TypeHierarchy #623

fabianbs96 opened this issue May 29, 2023 · 0 comments · Fixed by #702
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Milestone

Comments

@fabianbs96
Copy link
Member

Story

The current LLVMTypeHierarchy implementation relies on unrealistic assumptions about the code structure in LLVM IR and is of only little use in practice.
We need a more robust implementation that relies on debug-information.

Prerequisites

  • issue x

Out Of Scope

  • A isn't part of this

Acceptance Criteria

The following acceptance criteria are defined regarding the result of this story:
Clarify what the final result should be, not how to accomplish it.

  • DebugInfo-based TypeHierarchy implementation that works even for C++-based IR that was composed from different source-files via llvm-link
  • Criterion 2

Related Stories

  • none

Follow-up Stories

  • none
@fabianbs96 fabianbs96 added the enhancement New feature or request label Jun 17, 2023
@MMory MMory added this to the Release 2403 milestone Feb 1, 2024
@fabianbs96 fabianbs96 linked a pull request Feb 25, 2024 that will close this issue
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants