You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I would like to warn about a behavior change not listed in the release notes. In 3.x versions, passing the UFDR parent folder to -d parameter used to work non intentionally. In version 4, to make behavior consistent across input formats, now it is mandatory to pass the UFDR file itself to -d parameter to ingest it correctly. Passing the parent folder would not work fine, the UFDR file would be processed like a generic ZIP file, not like an UFDR file.
reacted with thumbs up emoji reacted with thumbs down emoji reacted with laugh emoji reacted with hooray emoji reacted with confused emoji reacted with heart emoji reacted with rocket emoji reacted with eyes emoji
-
Hello all,
I would like to warn about a behavior change not listed in the release notes. In 3.x versions, passing the UFDR parent folder to -d parameter used to work non intentionally. In version 4, to make behavior consistent across input formats, now it is mandatory to pass the UFDR file itself to -d parameter to ingest it correctly. Passing the parent folder would not work fine, the UFDR file would be processed like a generic ZIP file, not like an UFDR file.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions