SJIP 8: Missing Curcuit Breaker Checks #8
Locked
WangSecurity
started this conversation in
Judging
Replies: 1 comment 5 replies
-
Correct me if I'm wrong, but it looks like all of the other rules are exclusions of actual low severity, whereas this I believe is the first Med that's being excluded. Shouldn't it be a readme question rather than changing to low severity? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
5 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
Description
Make Chainlick's Curcuit Breaker Checks (checking if price if above/lower maxAnswer/minAnswer) low severity by default
Judging Guidelines PR
https://github.com/sherlock-protocol/sherlock-v2-docs/pull/32/files
Rationale
Firstly, on most of price feeds these checks are deprecated as can be seen in Chainlink's Docs
Secondly, while it's still used on some of them, these are basically sanity checks, e.g. minAnswer on ETH/USD Price Feed is $10.
Hence, to improve the judging efficiency and let Watsons spend more time on more complex issues, I believe missing checks for minAnswer and maxAnswer should be clarified as low severity so it doesn't cause unnecessary discussions.
Relevant Issue Discussions
sherlock-audit/2024-04-alchemix-judging#80
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions