-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 71
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Improve the check command view #726
Comments
@maethor : if you wish to backport, you can cherry-pick this commit: mohierf@ddf162a |
This rendering is not really perfect because it would be better to display the real executed command. At the moment, in the example, the |
Nice idea. I will have a look. |
Indeed, on my own fork, the integ branch is up-to-date with many modifications and I tested as much as I could with Alignak AND Shinken (thanks to docker) ... you should give a try and we could merge in the main repo ? |
Would you be able to make PR ? I prefer to avoid cherry picking. In this issue for instance, I don't know if the commit you are talking about in the second message is covering the modifications you are talking about in the forth and fifth messages. |
On the host/service view, the check command is simply rendered as the check command name. There is no information about the arguments and about the real command that is executed after the macro expansion.
This may be improved like this:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: