Undertake a collaborative policy project with research funders to revise funding policies to encourage reuse and contributions to public software infrastructure #24
Labels
Activity: Documentation
Improvements or additions to documentation
Activity: Organizing / Action
This involves organizing, capacity building or other practical actions to advance research software
Activity
This is a policy activity
Topic: Public software
This topic covers issues pertaining to public software
Potential Activity Scope
Undertaking a collaborative policy project with research funders to revise funding policies is a significant initiative aimed at fostering a more supportive and sustainable environment for public software infrastructure:
The project begins by recognizing the critical role that public software infrastructure plays in modern research. Whether it is data analysis, simulation, or collaboration tools, public software enables researchers to work more efficiently and innovatively. However, the current funding landscape may not adequately encourage or support the reuse and contributions to this vital infrastructure.
The project emphasizes collaboration between relevant stakeholders, including research funders, academic institutions, software developers, researchers, and policymakers. By bringing together diverse perspectives and expertise, the project can create more informed, relevant, and effective policy revisions.
A key step in the project would be to analyze existing funding policies, identifying areas where they may fall short in encouraging the reuse and contributions to public software infrastructure. This involves a detailed review of funding calls, reviewer guidelines, grant officer practices, and other related aspects.
Based on the analysis, the project would seek to develop new guidelines and criteria that explicitly promote and reward the reuse and contributions to public software infrastructure. This may include incentives, recognition, training, and support for researchers who engage in these practices.
Throughout the project, there's a strong emphasis on engaging with the broader research and software community. This ensures that the policy revisions are not only theoretically sound but also practically applicable and responsive to the real needs and dynamics of the field.
Once the revisions are developed, the project involves working closely with research funders to implement them into their funding calls, review processes, and grant management practices. This requires careful planning, communication, and support to ensure a smooth and successful transition.
After implementation, the project should ideally include ongoing monitoring and evaluation to assess the impact of the policy revisions. This involves tracking metrics such as the number of reuses, contributions, collaborations, and innovations related to public software infrastructure, as well as gathering feedback and insights from the community.
Recognizing that both technology and research practices continually evolve, the project should emphasize continuous improvement. The policy revisions would not be static but rather they need to be designed to adapt and grow with the changing landscape of research and public software infrastructure.
Potential Objectives
Targeted Impacts
This potential activity was curated as part of "Charting the Course: Policy and Planning for Sustainable Research Software," a Sloan Foundation-funded project within URSSI dedicated to supporting the future of research software through evidence-informed policy work (Project contacts are: @danielskatz and @dr-eric-jensen). If you are interested in working on this, please add a comment.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: