Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Smart Highlighter: use of the Settings window? #53

Open
Otiel opened this issue Apr 4, 2017 · 5 comments
Open

Smart Highlighter: use of the Settings window? #53

Otiel opened this issue Apr 4, 2017 · 5 comments

Comments

@Otiel
Copy link

Otiel commented Apr 4, 2017

I don't get the use of the Settings window for the Smart Highlighter plugin.

screenshot

Anyone can enlighten me?

@sieukrem
Copy link
Owner

sieukrem commented Apr 4, 2017

The Settings Window was introduced during solving of issue #21. I agree it is not clear.

Settings Window lists existing Indicators of Notepad++. Indicator is a term comming from Scintilla and is used to highlight characters. I don't know how to describe this feature in terms of Notepad++ in the Setting window. Please make a suggestion!

@Otiel
Copy link
Author

Otiel commented Apr 5, 2017

So if I understand correctly, each indicator number corresponds to a style defined here?

Scintilla indicators

@sieukrem
Copy link
Owner

sieukrem commented Apr 5, 2017

It may or may not! This table lists styles which could be assign any indicator.

@Otiel
Copy link
Author

Otiel commented Apr 5, 2017

I see... It's hard to make any perfect suggestion then.

I would at least:

  • Invert both columns
  • Rename the "Indicator number" by "Scintilla indicator"
  • Name the other column "Show on highlight bar"

@Skrell
Copy link

Skrell commented May 24, 2023

I'm confused... the Scintilla indicators start at index 0 not 1? I'm trying to figure out how to stop the black bars from highlighting hyperlinks

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants