Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Use sacc in multi-like covariance #61

Open
mgerbino opened this issue Apr 29, 2022 · 3 comments
Open

Use sacc in multi-like covariance #61

mgerbino opened this issue Apr 29, 2022 · 3 comments
Assignees
Labels
enhancement New feature or request good first issue Good for newcomers lower priority Not required soon
Milestone

Comments

@mgerbino
Copy link
Collaborator

We should upgrade the reading of the cross-covariance in the multi-like module so to use sacc format.

@mgerbino mgerbino added enhancement New feature or request good first issue Good for newcomers tests Improvements to tests labels Apr 29, 2022
@mgerbino mgerbino self-assigned this Apr 29, 2022
@mgerbino mgerbino added lower priority Not required soon and removed tests Improvements to tests labels Apr 29, 2022
@itrharrison itrharrison added this to the v0.1 milestone Dec 2, 2022
@itrharrison
Copy link
Collaborator

Note: ensure sacc is used where possible, but do not require sacc use where currently not possible (e.g. cluster counts, lensing noise).

@mgerbino
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@itrharrison Currently, cross-covariances (when available) are loaded from a .npz file that contains several issues of cross-cov. Since sacc allows to store one covariance per file, maybe sacc is not the most suitable format in this case? We can keep npz file or replace it with a fits.

@itrharrison
Copy link
Collaborator

I think sacc can select only relevant blocks of a covariance matrix... so we would store the whole covariance matrix and then just extract the right bits if not using all the probes.

So if you remove some tracers or some data points then I think the parts of the full covmat are also removed along with the data points.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request good first issue Good for newcomers lower priority Not required soon
Projects
None yet
Development

When branches are created from issues, their pull requests are automatically linked.

2 participants