-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Don't isolate the rf shielding #71
Comments
What you see is the result of a slight overkill of a different problem. The problem is that the SMA connector pins protrude quite a bit from the PCB and should not, according to good practices, touch the panel. Unfortunately we could not find SMA connectors with shorter pins. One possible solution is to cut the pins close to the PCB manually, but we tried it and this process is quite "barbaric" and introduces a lot of stress on the PCB, introducing significant risk of damaging the module. The solution which was used here is Kapton foil insulation between the panel and the pins. Obviously, one could use it only on the part of the panel next to the pins. In the solution above the panel still has electrical contact with the PCB trough the screws and the brackets holding the panel, but I agee that we should introduce a better solution. |
It's not panel-to-PCB but pane-to-panel contact that's broken. That placement of the Kapton tape makes the RF shielded panel useless. I agree that cutting the SMA pins is a bad idea. I see the following options:
|
|
Having continuous electrical contact is the point of it.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: