Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Any interest in CLMUL and XROT2? #14

Open
Logan007 opened this issue Jun 4, 2021 · 0 comments · May be fixed by #13
Open

Any interest in CLMUL and XROT2? #14

Logan007 opened this issue Jun 4, 2021 · 0 comments · May be fixed by #13

Comments

@Logan007
Copy link
Contributor

Logan007 commented Jun 4, 2021

Are there any plans or is there any interest at all in having

implemented?

I would expect CLMUL to have slightly less influence on bias than a regular integer multiplication due to the lack of carry's left-bound "smearing" effect.

XROT2 should show an effect on lowering bias which I would assume somewhere between one and two xor-shifts – remains to be proven. Execution on super-pipelined CPUs could speed-wise benefit from working on the very same x being rotated twice. However, little coding challenge here: two parameters a and b need to be parsed from command line's -p pattern.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

1 participant