Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Channel access vs. PVA #192

Open
nneveu opened this issue Sep 18, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

Channel access vs. PVA #192

nneveu opened this issue Sep 18, 2024 · 0 comments

Comments

@nneveu
Copy link
Member

nneveu commented Sep 18, 2024

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
We are currently using channel access through PyEpics. Due to security concerns, channel access may be going away in the next two years at SLAC. We should look at switching to PVA if possible or investigate whether PyEpics developers are going to update the PyEpics PV class to use PVA instead of channel access.

Describe the solution you'd like
Use a different class for PVA vs. the PyEpics PV class.
This applies to devices that call PVs, for example magnets.

Or confirm that PyEpics developers will update PV class to use PVA vs. channel access.

Describe alternatives you've considered
Alternative is channel access goes away at SLAC in a year or two and we can not use devices in lcls-tools anymore.

Additional context
Might be a good issue for support from RadiaSoft.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant