Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Recent performance results (tables) of AWFY #85

Open
rochus-keller opened this issue Jan 15, 2024 · 2 comments
Open

Recent performance results (tables) of AWFY #85

rochus-keller opened this issue Jan 15, 2024 · 2 comments

Comments

@rochus-keller
Copy link

rochus-keller commented Jan 15, 2024

The results document is useful but didn't change since eight years.

Are there any updated performance tables somewhere like this one and this one comparing different Smalltalk, Lua and JS implementations with Java (and possibly C++)? If there are no current results, is there at least a complete, referencable table somewhere with the latest measurement results, and ideally a brief description of the candidate VMs?

The timeline view referenced in the readme doesn't seem to work anymore, and personally I consider simple tables to be more useful than graphs.

I also had a look at https://arewefastyet.com which seems to have changed and now compares browser JS VMs only.

@smarr
Copy link
Owner

smarr commented Jan 15, 2024

Yeah...

This is all a "best effort" operation...

Some "unofficial" documents in my tmp folder. tmp means they can disappear without notice:

@rochus-keller
Copy link
Author

Great, thank you very much. Why not make the documents "official"?

What is PySOM JIT?

Do you happen to also have results with the Cog/OpenSmalltalk VM?

Which distribution is represented by median_ratio, min_ratio and max_ratio? Is it the distribution of the benchmarks per technology, or different runs of the benchmarks? If the former, what is the advantage of the median over the geomean?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants