We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
A lot of in { assert(blah, ""); } would be advantageously replaced by in(blah, "").
in { assert(blah, ""); }
in(blah, "")
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Use new contract syntax for non-complex ones
a06280e
Resolves snazzy-d#249.
Use new contract syntax for non-complex contracts
377b63d
dd740da
Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.
A lot of
in { assert(blah, ""); }
would be advantageously replaced byin(blah, "")
.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: