Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add or update 21x tracks #83

Open
2 of 3 tasks
irabinovitch opened this issue Jul 18, 2023 · 11 comments
Open
2 of 3 tasks

Add or update 21x tracks #83

irabinovitch opened this issue Jul 18, 2023 · 11 comments

Comments

@irabinovitch
Copy link
Collaborator

irabinovitch commented Jul 18, 2023

@kcbraunschweig please add a list of tracks for SCALE 21x when you have a moment.
Once we have those @DrupalPhil and I need to do the following:

  • Create tracks in the track taxonomy
  • hide tracks by id in the ./sites/all/modules/custom/scale_utility/scale_utility.module
  • run through the various CFP reports (Eg presentation filtered) and make sure they match the list we expect.
@kcbraunschweig
Copy link
Collaborator

Here is the 21x track list:

Career Day
Cloud Native
Data on Kubernetes (DoK)
Developer
DevOpsDayLA
Embedded
FOSS@Home
General
HAM Radio & Linux
Kernel & Low Level Systems
Kubernetes Community Day
MySQL
Observability
Open Government
Open Source AI and Applied Science
PostgreSQL@SCaLE (PostgreSQL)
Reproducible and Immutable Software
Security
Systems & Infrastructure
The Next Generation
UpSCaLE

@irabinovitch
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@DrupalPhil let me know if you need help adding or hiding these.

@irabinovitch
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Added new tracks in the Track taxonomy, and hid the unused old ones in #98

@irabinovitch
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@kcbraunschweig take a look and let me know if it works as expected. We might still need to fix a few of the track lists in the CFP reports

@kcbraunschweig
Copy link
Collaborator

image On the cfp form page it looks like all the new tracks are there but some old ones need to be removed. Also I'd prefer to update some so that the text matches exactly what's in the cfp text and what we're tracking elsewhere:

Aerospace -> remove
Data on Kubernetes -> Data on Kubernetes (DoK)
FOSS @ HOME -> FOSS@Home
HAM Radio -> HAM Radio & Linux
Next Generation -> The Next Generation
Open Data -> remove
Open Medical -> remove
PostgreSQL -> PostgreSQL@SCaLE (PostgreSQL)
Systems and Infrastructure -> Systems & Infrastructure
Test -> this one always confuses people that think it is for talks about Testing so can we change it to "Test Topic (do not use)" or something?
Workshops -> remove (workshops should be submitted in their topic area)

@irabinovitch
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Try refreshing? Here's what I see. All the ones you flagged for removal should already be gone via #98
image

@kcbraunschweig
Copy link
Collaborator

ah another refresh fixed it, yes all the removed ones I see removed now

@kcbraunschweig
Copy link
Collaborator

Ok 2 internal pages that still need track filter updates:
Topic filter on https://www.socallinuxexpo.org/presentations-filtered
and https://www.socallinuxexpo.org/presentation-votes

  • remove Aerospace
  • remove Containers and Orchestrators
  • add Data on Kubernetes
  • remove LibreGraphics
  • remove Open Data
  • remove Open Medical
  • remove Open Source in Enterprises
  • add Open Source AI and Applied Science
  • add Reproducible and Immutable Software

@irabinovitch
Copy link
Collaborator Author

I dont think we should hide these on the internal pages.

@kcbraunschweig
Copy link
Collaborator

I don't understand? Why have filters that don't work for tracks that don't exist? Or are you saying there's only 1 filter list regardless of year so removing some means we can't use them for previous years? If that's the case, then agreed, don't remove any, just add the new ones.
But for the redesign then I'd ask that the filters be set based on the tracks for that year rather than globally. Otherwise the list will just grow unbounded over time.

@irabinovitch
Copy link
Collaborator Author

I dont believe those pages have any sense of a filter list. So if we remove them, we'd be removing the ability to filter on them in any year.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants