You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
We are keeping a list of funding sources with some preliminary RDF structure that looks like this :
:CCIG
a roh:FundingProgram ;
rdfs:label "Consensus Community Innovation Grants"@en ;
schema:website <http://agree.org/> ;
rdfs:description "?" ;
roh:hasFundingProgramClassification "?" .
My thought is that we start with minimal information but have the possibility to add optional fields like what types of grants are supported. http://w3id.org/roh/0.3/#hasFundingProgramClassification provides a slot for that but we'd still need a standard vocab for valid objects of the predicate - perhaps UNESCO thesaurus terms or Standard Occupational Codes? .
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Other potentially useful vocabs from the same ontology (on the initial list the 3 are a bit mixed together, see #6 for a proposition of corrections):
FundingOrganization A defined class of organizations that fund Grants A vivo:FundingOrganization inherits from foaf:Organization, it promotes (roh:promotes) a roh:FundingSource who roh:funds a roh:FundingProgram.
FundingSource A roh:FundingSource roh:feeds a roh:Funding with funds to sponsor some projects.
FundingProgram A programme of related funded projects, typically established by a funding organization.
We are keeping a list of funding sources with some preliminary RDF structure that looks like this :
My thought is that we start with minimal information but have the possibility to add optional fields like what types of grants are supported. http://w3id.org/roh/0.3/#hasFundingProgramClassification provides a slot for that but we'd still need a standard vocab for valid objects of the predicate - perhaps UNESCO thesaurus terms or Standard Occupational Codes? .
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: