Custom Datasink Config (JSON) and Custom Transfer Process Request (JSON) options #454
Answered
by
richardtreier
epanagou-ubitech
asked this question in
Q&A
-
Hello community! What is the difference between the We have tried the JSONs we found in the following resources:
However, in the case of
Finally, is there an advantage to using one of these options instead of the REST-API Endpoint option? Thank you in advance! |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Answered by
richardtreier
Aug 29, 2023
Replies: 1 comment 3 replies
-
Hello, this is indeed a bug, and will be fixed in future releases. Fixed in #455 |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
3 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Consuming and providing Parameterized HTTP data offers is supported through our UI by now. You should be able to click "Show HTTP Datasource Parameterization" in the transfer dialog, which will allow you to provide overrides.
When trying out a data sink type that is not available via the UI with a custom backend, one might want to use the
Custom Datasink Config (JSON)
to initiate the transfer process, e.g.:However, when one also wants to pass parameters to the providing connector or play around with the detailed configuration of EDC transfer processes, one wou…