Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Loosen version requirements #269

Open
spenserblack opened this issue Jan 12, 2023 · 0 comments
Open

Loosen version requirements #269

spenserblack opened this issue Jan 12, 2023 · 0 comments
Labels
dependencies Pull requests that update a dependency file help wanted Extra attention is needed packaging Issues related to packaging for various environments

Comments

@spenserblack
Copy link
Owner

spenserblack commented Jan 12, 2023 •
edited
Loading

To make this compatible on more environments, there should be looser dependency requirements.

Notes

  • Quickly skimming the diff between the latest 4.x.y and 6.0.0, octokit might be OK for a wider
    range.

How you can help

If you happen to find this issue, please note the versions used for this tool's dependencies. For example, on Ubuntu focal, ruby-octokit is on 4.16.0
@spenserblack spenserblack added dependencies Pull requests that update a dependency file packaging Issues related to packaging for various environments help wanted Extra attention is needed labels Jan 12, 2023
spenserblack added a commit that referenced this issue Feb 1, 2023
@spenserblack
Add make target to build .deb package
aff77f5 
This loosens some version requirements (#269).

It forces ruby-actionview to use a different version, since the apt
version is not standard semver.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
dependencies Pull requests that update a dependency file help wanted Extra attention is needed packaging Issues related to packaging for various environments
Projects
repofetch
Status: Backlog
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@spenserblack