-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Need to define some concepts commonly #4
Comments
I wouldn't say that the vocabulary is still very "German". It is still very "spherity.com" because we are hosting the repository and the web site. We are open to change this. We can move the repository, the base url as well as the host for publishing spec and context to an official server. Suggestions are welcome. I agree upon the procedure. Who has contacts to SEMIC and can define and request changes? According to the items in the list:
|
Latest version is NACE 2.1, I guess that would be Nace021 written like that: |
Still aware of the OID EUCC Voc being "very German", I'd like to point out the necessity to agree - even in the EWC context - on the concepts used. Classes and properties labeled similarily as in the EU Core Vocabularies are not a great problem (although we SHOULD look together at the descriptions of all classes and properties/attributes...), but the few one's that differ from the EU Core Vocabularies should at least be examined together:
I'm referring to the following list:
Maybe something else as well > the approach should IMHO be that:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: