Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Problem with ack.vim #54

Closed
rlisowski opened this issue Jan 3, 2014 · 7 comments
Closed

Problem with ack.vim #54

rlisowski opened this issue Jan 3, 2014 · 7 comments

Comments

@rlisowski
Copy link

I use [ack.vim](https://github.com/mileszs/ack.vim plugin) it show search result in the quickfix window but with dwm.vim enabled quickfix window appears on the right instead of the bottom of current buffer.

Is there any way to fix that?

@spolu
Copy link
Owner

spolu commented Jan 3, 2014

Well we have to figure out if there is anyway to detect ack.vim window. Is it tagged? If so you should be able to have a fix based on #50 #51 #52

@rlisowski
Copy link
Author

There is buftype == 'quickfix' and filetype == 'qf', but I don't know how use that and I think I didn't explain exactly what my problem is.
This is what I expect:
image
This is what I get with dwm:
image

@spolu
Copy link
Owner

spolu commented Jan 3, 2014

Yep it makes sense. I'll try to find some time to test and find a solution but I'm pretty swamped these days. @FlashKorten or @n4kz may have an opinion on this?

@n4kz
Copy link
Contributor

n4kz commented Jan 29, 2014

Actual behaviour is similar to dwm itself. We can modify autocommand to ignore quickfix buffer but first layout update will move it to stack.

@n4kz
Copy link
Contributor

n4kz commented Jan 30, 2014

Same problem in #24 and #49
I'm looking for solution but cannot promise anything.

@spolu
Copy link
Owner

spolu commented Jan 30, 2014

@n4kz that would be awesome! Would be glad to help though I don't have much free cycle these days. Let me know!

@rlisowski
Copy link
Author

Works for me.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants