You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Oct 25, 2024. It is now read-only.
I use tape to queue up very small objects (IDs of 24 bytes). They come one by one or in batches of anywhere from 2 to 100 at a time averaging 10 at a time (I have a blocking queue on top of the tape with many producers and one consumer) so performance I am getting is not very good due to constant IO disk sync. It would improve dramatically if tape supported addAll(Collection<byte[]>) in addition to simple add(byte[]) as it would mean just one sync instead of current 10 for me.
Is there any chance it could be added to 2.0?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I use tape to queue up very small objects (IDs of 24 bytes). They come one by one or in batches of anywhere from 2 to 100 at a time averaging 10 at a time (I have a blocking queue on top of the tape with many producers and one consumer) so performance I am getting is not very good due to constant IO disk sync. It would improve dramatically if tape supported addAll(Collection<byte[]>) in addition to simple add(byte[]) as it would mean just one sync instead of current 10 for me.
Is there any chance it could be added to 2.0?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: