We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Hello thanks for this!
Based on the ColbertV2 paper: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2112.01488
In table 5, you have very low results on NQ for example compared to some models in the leaderboard for retrieval: https://huggingface.co/spaces/mteb/leaderboard
Is there a reason behind this?
If single-vector retrievers from mteb leaderboard are better at most datasets, why use the multi-vector ?
Thanks
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
.
Sorry, something went wrong.
No branches or pull requests
Hello thanks for this!
Based on the ColbertV2 paper: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2112.01488
In table 5, you have very low results on NQ for example compared to some models in the leaderboard for retrieval: https://huggingface.co/spaces/mteb/leaderboard
Is there a reason behind this?
If single-vector retrievers from mteb leaderboard are better at most datasets, why use the multi-vector ?
Thanks
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: