You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Specificity is currently computed by comparing random samples to the training examples
as represented in the model (i.e. given by the scores). This is done in order to avoid alignment problems. In this approach the test error can be made smaller by having a less expressive model (i.e. a model with 0 parameter would always yield 0 error, as the only training sample in the model representation is the mean).
A better solution might be to align the model first with the training images and use those for the validation.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Specificity is currently computed by comparing random samples to the training examples
as represented in the model (i.e. given by the scores). This is done in order to avoid alignment problems. In this approach the test error can be made smaller by having a less expressive model (i.e. a model with 0 parameter would always yield 0 error, as the only training sample in the model representation is the mean).
A better solution might be to align the model first with the training images and use those for the validation.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: