You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I have been playing around with ULib after seeing how impressive the performance was on the Techempower benchmarks, and I was trying to see what the performance is like while using a more standard .usp file instead of the hyper-optimized version used in the Techempower tests. However when I try it using the same docker configuration used in the Techempower test, my simple .usp file does not work e.g.
Then I run curl against the endpoint this is the response that I get:
root@ip-xxx-xxx-xxx-xxx:/# curl -v http://server/plain
* Trying xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx...
* TCP_NODELAY set
* Connected to server (xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx) port 8080 (#0)
> GET /plain HTTP/1.1
> Host: server:8080
> User-Agent: curl/7.58.0
> Accept: */*
>
< HTTP/1.1 200 OK
< Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2020 01:27:23 GMT
< Server: ULib
< Content-Type: text/plain
* no chunk, no close, no size. Assume close to signal end
<
And the body is not returned. I looked at the code and played around with the feature flags until I realized which one was causing the problem. When --enable-captive-portal is used, simple .usp files no longer work, but the techempower optimized ones do. Is this a bug?
This is the configure command that I used in my test:
When I remove --enable-captive-portal from the configure command, .usp files work again, but performance of the optimized json and plaintext examples drops by about 30%
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
talawahtech
changed the title
USP files don't work when --enable-captive-portal is set
Regular USP files don't work when --enable-captive-portal is set
Apr 27, 2020
@stefanocasazza ok thanks for confirming. Are you able to provide a some insight as to what the issue is? Why is --enable-captive-portal required and why does it affect the performance like that?
--enable-captive-portal indicate a limited context (for example POST
is disabled), in general it is used only with specified usp and plugin
(mod_nodog, mod_nocat)...
2020-05-24 15:56 GMT+02:00, Marc Richards <[email protected]>:
@stefanocasazza ok thanks for confirming. Are you able to provide a some
insight as to what the issue is? Why is `--enable-captive-portal` required
and why does it affect the performance like that?
--
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
#80 (comment)
Hi,
I have been playing around with ULib after seeing how impressive the performance was on the Techempower benchmarks, and I was trying to see what the performance is like while using a more standard .usp file instead of the hyper-optimized version used in the Techempower tests. However when I try it using the same docker configuration used in the Techempower test, my simple .usp file does not work e.g.
Then I run curl against the endpoint this is the response that I get:
And the body is not returned. I looked at the code and played around with the feature flags until I realized which one was causing the problem. When
--enable-captive-portal
is used, simple .usp files no longer work, but the techempower optimized ones do. Is this a bug?This is the configure command that I used in my test:
When I remove
--enable-captive-portal
from the configure command, .usp files work again, but performance of the optimized json and plaintext examples drops by about 30%The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: