Map FOLIO item statuses to item_display current locations #973
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
corylown
force-pushed
the
937-folio-status
branch
from
d468d7e
to
7f131b7
Compare
cbeer
approved these changes
Jul 14, 2023
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There's possibly more to do here, but the more I look at it the more confused I get. Other possible item statuses to location mappings are:Additional mappings:
'On order' => 'ON-ORDER''In process (non-requestable)' => 'INPROCESS'OR 'AT-REPAIR' or 'BINDERY' (or other BIND code)'Awaiting pickup' => "#{library_code}-LOAN"(but how to know at which service desk?)'Awaiting delivery' => "#{library_code}-LOAN"(but how to know at which service desk?)Mapped
Awaiting deliveryto GRE-LOAN for lack of a more generic code.Not clear whether these should map to a current location in item_display or not.Closes #937