You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
So... #11 is still an issue by 2023 and I just wasted 2 hours on that.
Just using taskpirate with the default timewarrior on-modify hook results in this:
Tracking "Testing" Project a e i p r t v
Started 2023-04-17T20:35:33
Current 33
Total 0:00:00
(the set tag was "private")
Please make an annotation in the README that hooks should be named in a way, that stuff that isn't meant to run with taskpirate comes alphabetically prior to taskpirate.
The order of execution can simply be checked with task diagnostics:
I fully acknowledge that this isn't a bug of this project, but this bug makes taskpirate just incompatible with the default upstream timewarrior hook if people take the default naming scheme of taskwarrior and timewarrior.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I've too been bitten by this. Which I have to say really undermines my confidence in the robustness of tasklib/taskpirate, as just silently changing the type isn't really playing nice with others.
So... #11 is still an issue by 2023 and I just wasted 2 hours on that.
Just using taskpirate with the default timewarrior on-modify hook results in this:
(the set tag was "private")
Please make an annotation in the README that hooks should be named in a way, that stuff that isn't meant to run with taskpirate comes alphabetically prior to taskpirate.
The order of execution can simply be checked with
task diagnostics
:I fully acknowledge that this isn't a bug of this project, but this bug makes taskpirate just incompatible with the default upstream timewarrior hook if people take the default naming scheme of taskwarrior and timewarrior.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: