Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Aug 22, 2024. It is now read-only.

Consider raw XML approach for qgepqwat2ili instead of ili2pg workflow #24

Open
olivierdalang opened this issue Mar 16, 2023 · 0 comments
Open

Consider raw XML approach for qgepqwat2ili instead of ili2pg workflow #24

olivierdalang opened this issue Mar 16, 2023 · 0 comments
Labels
sustainability Improvement of the code with the aim of making it easier to maintain / reduce the technical debt

Comments

@olivierdalang
Copy link
Contributor

The ili2pg workflow offers some benefits (parsing/writing already implemented), but also many drawbacks (speed, a 3rd datamodel definition with different constraints, java dependency, difficulty to deal with SIA405 VS VSA-DSS that don't properly inherit from each other, etc.).

We could consider again writing/reading the .xtf directly, as these data formats are simple and well documented, and keep ili toolkit only for pre/post-processing (ilivalidator, translating xtfs to french, normalizing data format, etc.)
@olivierdalang olivierdalang added the sustainability Improvement of the code with the aim of making it easier to maintain / reduce the technical debt label Mar 16, 2023
@olivierdalang olivierdalang added this to the Wastewater 2023.1 milestone Mar 16, 2023
@3nids 3nids removed this from the Wastewater 2023.1 milestone Mar 20, 2023
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
sustainability Improvement of the code with the aim of making it easier to maintain / reduce the technical debt
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@3nids @olivierdalang