You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Is this related to #6, and specifically, are you interested in read counts (counting the number of reads mapped) in both issues rather than nucleotide coverage?
Is this related to #6, and specifically, are you interested in read counts (counting the number of reads mapped) in both issues rather than nucleotide coverage?
Hi telatin,
these are two independent issues. Both of them are preferred with read counts (per base is covered by how many reads). For example, if 3,000,000 reads were sequenced in total, chr1:123-123 covered by 3,00 reads, the RPM for this base will be 100.
Ok, consider that bamtocov computes nucleotide coverage, while bamtocounts focuses on read counts on a target, and it has some options for normalization already built-in.
Ok, consider that bamtocov computes nucleotide coverage, while bamtocounts focuses on read counts on a target, and it has some options for normalization already built-in.
Oh, I must misunderstand the read counts and nucleotide coverage. Both of these #6 and #7 are preferred with nucleotide coverage.
See the same example above, if 3,000,000 reads were sequenced in total, chr1:123-123 covered by 300 reads, then the nucleotide coverage and RPM for this base (chr1:123-123) will be 300 and 100.
No description provided.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: