Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Check actual file presence when performing differential backups #368

Closed
adejanovski opened this issue Jun 9, 2021 · 2 comments · Fixed by #716
Closed

Check actual file presence when performing differential backups #368

adejanovski opened this issue Jun 9, 2021 · 2 comments · Fixed by #716
Assignees
@rzvoncek
Labels
done Issues in the state 'done' zh:Product-Backlog

Comments

@adejanovski
Copy link
Contributor

adejanovski commented Jun 9, 2021 •
edited
Loading

Project board link

Follow up to #363

Verify presence of blobs that the new backup is going to "inherit" from the old ones instead of assuming that they are all present. If a blob referenced by a previous backup's manifest is missing and we have a local copy of the file with the same MD5 as listed in the manifest, just upload it again. This will patch the previous backups and make them whole again as well as preventing the current backup from becoming corrupted.

This prevents a corrupted backup from breaking all subsequent backups.

┆Issue is synchronized with this Jira Task by Unito
┆friendlyId: K8SSAND-1403
┆priority: Medium
@adejanovski adejanovski added the new Issues requiring triage label Jun 9, 2021
@jsanda
Copy link
Contributor

jsanda commented Apr 19, 2022

Please add your planning poker estimate with ZenHub @adejanovski

@adejanovski adejanovski added assess Issues in the state 'assess' help-wanted Issues in the state 'help-wanted' and removed assess Issues in the state 'assess' help-wanted Issues in the state 'help-wanted' labels Jun 5, 2023
@rzvoncek
Copy link
Contributor

rzvoncek commented Mar 5, 2024

Relates to #716 .

@adejanovski adejanovski added ready-for-review Issues in the state 'ready-for-review' and removed assess Issues in the state 'assess' labels Mar 5, 2024
@adejanovski adejanovski added review Issues in the state 'review' and removed ready-for-review Issues in the state 'ready-for-review' labels Mar 7, 2024
@adejanovski adejanovski added in-progress Issues in the state 'in-progress' and removed review Issues in the state 'review' labels Mar 18, 2024
@adejanovski adejanovski added in-progress Issues in the state 'in-progress' ready-for-review Issues in the state 'ready-for-review' review Issues in the state 'review' and removed in-progress Issues in the state 'in-progress' ready-for-review Issues in the state 'ready-for-review' labels Mar 18, 2024
@adejanovski adejanovski mentioned this issue Mar 21, 2024
Merged
@adejanovski adejanovski added done Issues in the state 'done' and removed review Issues in the state 'review' labels Mar 27, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@rzvoncek rzvoncek

Labels
done Issues in the state 'done' zh:Product-Backlog
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

Re-upload files if they are missing in storage thelastpickle/cassandra-medusa
3 participants
@jsanda @rzvoncek @adejanovski