You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I would have expected the second point to be extrapolated from the height and width. Is this an error, or are the docs that mention mix-and-matching being ok not applicable here?
Thanks!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hmm, that looks quite strange. I’m in the process of moving, so it will be a while before I can dive into this. I’ll get back to you as soon as I can.
Thanks for reporting this.
On Jul 13, 2021, at 4:37 PM, Brett Zamir ***@***.***> wrote:
With:
ShapeInfo.rectangle({x: 100, y: 150, width: 30, height: 10});
...I'm getting:
[
0: Point2D {x: 100, y: 150}
1: Point2D {x: 200, y: 300}
]
I would have expected the second point to be extrapolated from the height and width. Is this an error, or are the docs that mention mix-and-matching being ok not applicable here?
—
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe.
With:
...I'm getting:
I would have expected the second point to be extrapolated from the height and width. Is this an error, or are the docs that mention mix-and-matching being ok not applicable here?
Thanks!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: