Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Use LAPACKE C bindings instead of Atlas specific bindings #75

Open
StefanBruens opened this issue Feb 19, 2023 · 1 comment
Open

Use LAPACKE C bindings instead of Atlas specific bindings #75

StefanBruens opened this issue Feb 19, 2023 · 1 comment

Comments

@StefanBruens
Copy link

According to:
http://nicolas.limare.net/pro/notes/2014/10/31_cblas_clapack_lapacke/

LAPACKE is relatively recent (proposed in 2008, accepted in 2010) but it's the closest we have to a native C source-level interface to the original Fortran API. LAPACKE is to LAPACK what CBLAS is to BLAS, with this interface:
...
This one is standardized, as mentioned on Netlib: "Standard C language APIs for LAPACK".

Netlib Lapack is also available on significantly more distributions, compare Atlas:

atlas

and Lapack:

lapack

This also allows to use OpenBLAS or Intel MKL as Lapack/Blas implementation without any further work.

@StefanBruens
Copy link
Author

While there is no dedicated autotool support for lapacke, it provides a standard pkgconfig file which can be used.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant