You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I still have a question for this method. If we remove the ability to use different names in subclasses, I guess that we actually don't need to remain logic with a method's name as a string. We can just leave the abstract method "process" and use it. It will help understand codebase much faster and less painfully because the method is more explicit than the string name of the method
Because I removed the RUN_METHOD_ALIAS constant, there is a question of which functions/methods we need to keep and what to get rid of.
need to decide on these usages:
ml-pipeline-engine/ml_pipeline_engine/dag_builders/annotation/builder.py
Line 53 in cc2a0d0
ml-pipeline-engine/ml_pipeline_engine/dag_builders/annotation/builder.py
Line 97 in cc2a0d0
ml-pipeline-engine/ml_pipeline_engine/dag_builders/annotation/builder.py
Line 266 in cc2a0d0
ml-pipeline-engine/ml_pipeline_engine/dag_builders/annotation/builder.py
Line 292 in cc2a0d0
Originally posted by @Moootya in #33 (comment)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: