Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

NAS-131378 / 25.04 / Fangtooth iSCSI service data-test tag of the Running toggle is inconsistent with the other iSCSI toggle. #10762

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 27, 2024

Conversation

AlexKarpov98
Copy link
Contributor

Testing: see ticket

Screenshot 2024-09-27 at 14 11 40

…le is inconsistent with the other iSCSI toggle.
@AlexKarpov98 AlexKarpov98 self-assigned this Sep 27, 2024
@AlexKarpov98 AlexKarpov98 requested a review from a team as a code owner September 27, 2024 11:12
@AlexKarpov98 AlexKarpov98 requested review from RehanY147 and removed request for a team September 27, 2024 11:12
@bugclerk
Copy link
Contributor

@bugclerk bugclerk changed the title NAS-131378: Fangtooth iSCSI service data-test tag of the Running toggle is inconsistent with the other iSCSI toggle. NAS-131378 / 25.04 / Fangtooth iSCSI service data-test tag of the Running toggle is inconsistent with the other iSCSI toggle. Sep 27, 2024
Copy link

codecov bot commented Sep 27, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 80.29%. Comparing base (9c40ce8) to head (13476fa).
Report is 2 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master   #10762   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   80.29%   80.29%           
=======================================
  Files        1571     1571           
  Lines       51708    51711    +3     
  Branches     5838     5838           
=======================================
+ Hits        41519    41522    +3     
  Misses      10189    10189           
Flag Coverage Δ
80.29% <100.00%> (+<0.01%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@@ -33,6 +34,10 @@ export class ServiceStateColumnComponent extends ColumnComponent<ServiceRow> {

protected readonly isRunning = computed(() => this.service().state === ServiceStatus.Running);

get testIdServiceName(): string {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We can make it a signal

@bugclerk
Copy link
Contributor

This PR has been merged and conversations have been locked.
If you would like to discuss more about this issue please use our forums or raise a Jira ticket.

@truenas truenas locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Sep 27, 2024
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants