You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The current API closely mimics that of the C library. One could argue that this is too low-level.
A rustier approach would be for client apps to use newtypes representing table collections.
We could provide procedural macros to associate metadata types with these newtypes, eliminating the need for naming types in the metadata retrieval functions.
The same basic tricks could be applied to newtype wrappers for tree sequences, too.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
#249 brings up a bigger-picture issue.
The current API closely mimics that of the C library. One could argue that this is too low-level.
A rustier approach would be for client apps to use newtypes representing table collections.
We could provide procedural macros to associate metadata types with these newtypes, eliminating the need for naming types in the metadata retrieval functions.
The same basic tricks could be applied to newtype wrappers for tree sequences, too.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: