Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

algebra.ring.Semiring conflicts with Wikipedia Semiring definition in that it lacks a one element #4664

Open
benhutchison opened this issue Oct 10, 2024 · 1 comment

Comments

@benhutchison
Copy link
Member

The term Semiring is overloaded in Mathematics. . Cats uses an older terminology, where what Cats calls rig many people call Semiring.

NLab: "nowadays the primary definition of semiring used is the fourth [ie wikipedia] definition"

If there was ever a rebuild of Cats, I argue it should align with Wikipedia and nLab terminology. I also personally prefer this formulation which makes Semiring more powerful since it gives access to the one element.

@johnynek
Copy link
Contributor

IMO given that there isn't a well known standard and only o a matter of years trends may have changed we shouldn't break binary compatibility to follow that new popularity.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants