Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

How to Get the Imaginary Susceptibility in OOMMFC? #158

Open
msherburneUNM opened this issue Jul 6, 2021 · 2 comments
Open

How to Get the Imaginary Susceptibility in OOMMFC? #158

msherburneUNM opened this issue Jul 6, 2021 · 2 comments
Labels
awaiting response Needs feedback from person who opened issue backlog Good idea, has been added to our todo list. (No time to do it, though.) feature request needs clarification Issue needs a better explanation before it can be considered

Comments

@msherburneUNM
Copy link

Hello,

I've been reading through the documentation for OOMMFC but cannot seem to find how to get the imaginary susceptibility response across a range of frequencies? Is this capability supported?

@marijanbeg
Copy link
Member

Hi @msherburneUNM, thank you for your question and for using Ubermag. This capability is not integrated as being part of Ubermag. However, we believe this is something that can be done using other tools from Python's ecosystem.

We think it would be great if we could work on this together with you. We could start by you sharing the Jupyter notebook where you outline the requirements, share equations, and attempt computing the imaginary susceptibility. After that, we could exchange the notebook several times until we get the solution you need. Besides, we can identify if there are any functionalities we can move to Ubermag to make this computation easier, and we can use your notebook as a tutorial for other users and acknowledge you as a contributor to Ubermag.

@marijanbeg marijanbeg added awaiting response Needs feedback from person who opened issue backlog Good idea, has been added to our todo list. (No time to do it, though.) feature request needs clarification Issue needs a better explanation before it can be considered labels Jul 9, 2021
@MichaelSherburne
Copy link

@marijanbeg that would be great! I am hoping it is a fairly simple problem once I know what tools to use in Python. Do you know what other libraries in Python's ecosystem can compute the magnetic susceptibility (both real and imaginary) of the FMR? I'll share the Jupyter notebook link with you!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
awaiting response Needs feedback from person who opened issue backlog Good idea, has been added to our todo list. (No time to do it, though.) feature request needs clarification Issue needs a better explanation before it can be considered
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants