We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Sticking with the "there should be one way to do things" suggestion.
It appears a user can set both the density and the density_equation attribute and then it become unclear which is being used.
So removing the density_equation attribute but allowing density to be a string (which gets evaluated) is perhaps the best way to go.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
No branches or pull requests
Sticking with the "there should be one way to do things" suggestion.
It appears a user can set both the density and the density_equation attribute and then it become unclear which is being used.
So removing the density_equation attribute but allowing density to be a string (which gets evaluated) is perhaps the best way to go.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: