You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
discussed this with Peter at some point: less timelags the further one goes away from the event onset. They use a log-spacing. The principled way to do it would be with a basis function approach (I think).
Variance Partitioning: They have some kind of way to get rid of the crossvalidated, negative R2_total but better R2_ca variance issue. I have to check it out once more.
TRF with impulse and step functions, would be interesting to run some simulation of what kind of signal would require step functions? I have to check out what they do with the differing types. Given that they have ridge regression it might not be so important to them (they could see it as a feature expansion without any theoretical motivaiton)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
https://www.cell.com/neuron/fulltext/S0896-6273(19)30893-1
discussed this with Peter at some point: less timelags the further one goes away from the event onset. They use a log-spacing. The principled way to do it would be with a basis function approach (I think).
Variance Partitioning: They have some kind of way to get rid of the crossvalidated, negative R2_total but better R2_ca variance issue. I have to check it out once more.
TRF with impulse and step functions, would be interesting to run some simulation of what kind of signal would require step functions? I have to check out what they do with the differing types. Given that they have ridge regression it might not be so important to them (they could see it as a feature expansion without any theoretical motivaiton)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: