You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
fix: Remove `LimitNOFILE` from `containerd.service`
Remove `LimitNOFILE` from `containerd.service` to rely on the systemd v240 implicit default of `1024:524288`. On supported platforms with systemd prior to v240, packagers will patch the service with an explicit `LimitNOFILE=1024:524288`.
-`1024` soft limit is an implicit default, avoiding unexpected breakage. Software that needs a higher limit should request to raise the soft limit for its process.
-`524288` hard limit is an implicit default since systemd v240 and is adequate for most processes (_half of the historical limit from `fs.nr_open` of `1048576`_), while 4096 is the implicit default from the kernel (often too low).
- The hard limit may not exceed `fs.nr_open` (_which a value of `infinity` will resolve to_). On most systems with systemd v240 or newer, this will resolve to an excessive size of 2^30 (over 1 billion).
- When set to `infinity` (usually as the soft limit) software may experience significantly increased resource usage, resulting in a performance regression or runtime failures that are difficult to troubleshoot.
Signed-off-by: Brennan Kinney <[email protected]>
* 364bf956 "fix: Remove `LimitNOFILE` from `containerd.service` Remove `LimitNOFILE` from `containerd.service` to rely on the systemd v240 implicit default of `1024:524288`. On supported platforms with systemd prior to v240, packagers will patch the service with an explicit `LimitNOFILE=1024:524288`." ... FAIL
- PASS - commit does not have any whitespace errors
- PASS - has a valid DCO
- FAIL - commit subject exceeds 90 characters
* 3ca39ef0 "fix: Remove `LimitNOFILE` from `containerd.service`" ... PASS
- PASS - commit does not have any whitespace errors
- PASS - has a valid DCO
- PASS - commit subject is 72 characters or less! *yay*
Not sure if it's due to the content/formatting potentially throwing it off? Both locally on my git client and Github's own web view of the commit, presented the correct commit subject with the original commit (21 chars to spare within the 72 limit).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I'm trying to troubleshoot and really unsure what's happening here. Like, why it pulled-in the next lines as the "subject" line... Like, I wonder if it was some funky CRLF ?
I experienced this bug here
Failure occurring at:
git-validation/rules/shortsubject/shortsubject.go
Lines 32 to 37 in be39cec
git-validation/git/commits.go
Line 102 in be39cec
Presumably related to what's going on here (but I've not troubleshooted further):
git-validation/git/commits.go
Lines 177 to 184 in be39cec
Failing commit message:
FAIL - Results in:
PASS - While adding another blank line after the subject was successful 🤷♂️
Not sure if it's due to the content/formatting potentially throwing it off? Both locally on my git client and Github's own web view of the commit, presented the correct commit subject with the original commit (21 chars to spare within the 72 limit).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: