-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 40
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Idea of making a project on ESP32 + ETHERNET #31
Comments
why not kamil :) everything is possible
…On Sun, Oct 2, 2022 at 10:32 PM Kamil_B ***@***.***> wrote:
Hello,
I make various pcb boards and I have a proposal to make a professional
board for this project. I wanted to add MQTT broker control over ETHERNET,
is it possible to rewrite the software under ETHERNET ?
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#31>, or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AABQ6SYAAZSIFJJBE7DHCDDWBHWOLANCNFSM6AAAAAAQ3BTTLE>
.
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.Message
ID: ***@***.***>
--
Andrea Baccega
[image: ***@***.***
[image: ***@***.***
[image: Personal site] <http://www.andreabaccega.com/> [image: Linkedin
Profile] <http://it.linkedin.com/in/andreabaccega> [image: Facebook]
<https://www.facebook.com/andrea.baccega> [image: Google+]
<https://plus.google.com/109217393200753135791> [image: Twitter]
<http://twitter.com/veke87> [image: StackOverflow]
<http://stackoverflow.com/users/314407/andrea-baccega> [image: GitHub]
<https://github.com/vekexasia>
|
Thank you for your reply :) |
Very interesting! |
great @kamil2466! |
looks good. Keep us informed |
Looks great @kamil2466! I like the idea of making the board based on WT32 - ETH01. I was planning to design some boards for my SSR relays control in similar way. Are you going to publish the project files for the board design? |
Yes they will be made available :) For now it is a prototype after launching and testing I will make it available to everyone |
anybody having an idea how the firmware needs to be adapted for Ethernet support? |
I would personally go with porting it as a ESPHome component, it would make it more flexible to integrate with different things (including Ethernet). Unfortunately I currently don't have time to do it, also current solution works fine for me. |
@tezet what is your current solution? Does that solution use Ethernet? |
i'm designing a pcb as well. why would you want to use ethernet instead of wifi? |
@vekexasia, my reasons:
|
interesting Vincent. thanks for sharing.
the board i designed (check main repo now) is modular. You can design a hat
with Ethernet and disable wifi .... :)
…On Sun, Apr 30, 2023 at 7:12 AM Vinzent82 ***@***.***> wrote:
why would you want to use ethernet instead of wifi?
@vekexasia <https://github.com/vekexasia>, my reasons:
- better stability as my WiFiy quality is bad in the cellar
- we care for human radiation exposure. Thus we switch off our WiFi as
frequently as possible and it runs on minimum radiation power
- less energy consumption
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#31 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AABQ6S4RNLI5MKDMM3YHJ23XDXYDXANCNFSM6AAAAAAQ3BTTLE>
.
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID:
***@***.***>
--
Andrea Baccega
[image: ***@***.***
[image: ***@***.***
[image: Personal site] <http://www.andreabaccega.com/> [image: Linkedin
Profile] <http://it.linkedin.com/in/andreabaccega> [image: Facebook]
<https://www.facebook.com/andrea.baccega> [image: Google+]
<https://plus.google.com/109217393200753135791> [image: Twitter]
<http://twitter.com/veke87> [image: StackOverflow]
<http://stackoverflow.com/users/314407/andrea-baccega> [image: GitHub]
<https://github.com/vekexasia>
|
you can also directly use the board from olimex. See #51 |
That should works : https://github.com/nliaudat/esp_canbus 10$/board at jlcpcb |
@kamil2466 What is the status of this project? Did you get it working? |
@vekexasia would one of these [edit] |
This one https://docs.m5stack.com/en/unit/Unit-Mini%20CAN should be able to power the board from the can bus. I have one. I'm trying to use it in combination with an atoms3 lite / atoms3u, but the ESP32S3 doesn't compile. Will get a atom lite (regular esp32) and try with that. |
yeah saw that one, but can't order it (yet) in the Netherlands. if you stack that one, you still need to use a grove cable to connect it to the S3 right? Also the (TJA1051T/3) chip does not have isolation compared to CA-IS3050G chip. Don't know if its really needed btw, but sounds a bit safer. Did you change the board definition to build esphome? the s3 should be supported (s3 is also faster). have a look at an example esphome: https://github.com/fonske/Mitsubishi_procon/blob/main/esphome/boards/board-esp32S3.yaml |
This is the config I'm using:
and this is the (first) error:
|
Something like this should work: Seems to be ESPHome, it does not support platformIO 6 yet.
[edit] |
seems that we need to use an updated lib dep of the esp32_can. |
Got the M5stack atom lite. It works, powered via the 12V of the zehnder unit. |
use (my repo has the adjusted esp32 lib for S3):
and configure as
this builds :) no need to buy a regular. the S3 is faster |
Can you guys post a pic of Al these different builds? |
Components:
It's small enough to be tucked away under the wiring cover on the top of the unit. My first build (the original 3D printed box) isn't able to send commands to the ventilation unit. That's why I built the 2nd one, which (turns out) also isn't able to send commands to the ventilation unit. Perhaps it's due to the ComfoConnect LAN C and option box that are also connected to the unit. |
@vekexasia I still have a soldered version, but want to replace it. Would like a CAN module that can also power an atom3. Preferably no cable between the atom and CAN module. this https://docs.m5stack.com/en/atom/atom_can would have been ideal. |
Hello,
I make various pcb boards and I have a proposal to make a professional board for this project. I wanted to add MQTT broker control over ETHERNET, is it possible to rewrite the software under ETHERNET ?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: