Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add support for mbed TLS (formerly PolarSSL) #188

Open
jirutka opened this issue Jul 22, 2017 · 5 comments
Open

Add support for mbed TLS (formerly PolarSSL) #188

jirutka opened this issue Jul 22, 2017 · 5 comments

Comments

@jirutka
Copy link

jirutka commented Jul 22, 2017

Could you please consider adding support for some more secure and lightweight TLS implementation, such as mbed TLS (formerly PolarSSL)?

@daurnimator
Copy link
Collaborator

Is there a set of mbed/PolarSSL TLS lua bindings we can be compatible with?

@jirutka
Copy link
Author

jirutka commented Jul 23, 2017

I found these two, but neither of them has any release, so they are probably incomplete:

@daurnimator
Copy link
Collaborator

I would argue that there needs to be a high quality mbedtls lua library to create and manage TLS contexts before cqueues adds compatibility for it.

@luveti
Copy link

luveti commented Mar 30, 2021

It looks like a library that can create and manage TLS contexts now exists! https://github.com/neoxic/lua-mbedtls (docs links https://github.com/neoxic/lua-mbedtls/blob/master/doc/ssl.md)

@lePereT
Copy link

lePereT commented Jun 4, 2024

It would be great if cqueues (and by extension @daurnimator's excellent lua-http supported mbedtls, especially in the context of working with embedded linux where space is at a huge premium. now that complete lua bindings exist what would be the scale of this change?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants