Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Mismatch of example input/output example command does not work #11

Open
wanyu-l opened this issue Nov 12, 2021 · 1 comment
Open

Mismatch of example input/output example command does not work #11

wanyu-l opened this issue Nov 12, 2021 · 1 comment

Comments

@wanyu-l
Copy link
Owner

wanyu-l commented Nov 12, 2021

Screenshot (302).png

command in picture differs from example, which is only minor inconvenience but command would not work with "g:2"

@nus-pe-script
Copy link

nus-pe-script commented Nov 16, 2021

Team's Response

No details provided by team.

The 'Original' Bug

[The team marked this bug as a duplicate of the following bug]

Unable to create person with group

It seem like the user is unable to execute person John Lim /create p:91119111 e:[email protected] t:Loves Dancing g:1 .

If the user tries executes this command while the "persons list" is shown, an error is shown to say that the "group list" needs to be shown.

image.png

However, if the "groups list" is shown, an error is shown to say that the "persons list" needs to be shown.

image.png


[original: nus-cs2103-AY2122S1/pe-interim#138] [original labels: type.FunctionalityBug severity.High]

Their Response to the 'Original' Bug

[This is the team's response to the above 'original' bug]

Downgraded as you are still able to add person to group via the add to group command & you are still able to create persons. Hence this does not cause "major problems for users. i.e., makes the product almost unusable for most users".

Items for the Tester to Verify

❓ Issue duplicate status

Team chose to mark this issue as a duplicate of another issue (as explained in the Team's response above)

  • I disagree

Reason for disagreement: [replace this with your explanation]


❓ Issue type

Team chose [type.FunctionalityBug]
Originally [type.DocumentationBug]

  • I disagree

Reason for disagreement: [replace this with your explanation]


❓ Issue severity

Team chose [severity.Medium]
Originally [severity.Low]

  • I disagree

Reason for disagreement: [replace this with your explanation]


Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants