-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 7
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[Issue_183][WFLY-19397] Add a Jakarta Data TCK runner #184
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
d301e9f
to
a82926a
Compare
a82926a
to
993b3a6
Compare
<version.org.jboss.arquillian.jakarta>10.0.0.Final</version.org.jboss.arquillian.jakarta> | ||
<version.org.jboss.logging.jboss-logging>3.6.1.Final</version.org.jboss.logging.jboss-logging> | ||
<version.org.jboss.shrinkwrap.shrinkwrap>1.2.6</version.org.jboss.shrinkwrap.shrinkwrap> | ||
<version.org.junit>5.10.2</version.org.junit> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
FYI 5.11.3 is the latest.
<properties> | ||
<antlr.version>4.13.1</antlr.version> | ||
<arquillian.version>1.8.0.Final</arquillian.version> | ||
<junit.version>5.10.2</junit.version> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Same note here, 5.11.3.
|
||
<properties> | ||
<antlr.version>4.13.1</antlr.version> | ||
<arquillian.version>1.8.0.Final</arquillian.version> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We should probably use 1.9.1.Final and add a dependency for arquillian-jakarta here.
* | ||
* SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0 | ||
*/ | ||
package ee.jakarta.tck.data.tools.annp; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Are we allowed to use this package name?
<feature-pack> | ||
<groupId>${wildfly.feature.pack.groupId}</groupId> | ||
<artifactId>${wildfly.feature.pack.artifactId}</artifactId> | ||
<version>${version.org.wildfly.wildfly}</version> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
FWIW if we leave the version.org.wildfly.wildfly
property empty and use a channel, we don't have to upgrade the version for every new release.
@@ -0,0 +1,74 @@ | |||
package org.hibernate.data.tck.ext; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This feels like an odd package name here.
@@ -0,0 +1,14 @@ | |||
package org.hibernate.data.tck.ext; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This feels like an odd package name here.
* See the License for the specific language governing permissions and | ||
* limitations under the License. | ||
*/ | ||
package embedded; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This feels like an odd package name here.
* See the License for the specific language governing permissions and | ||
* limitations under the License. | ||
*/ | ||
package embedded; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This feels like an odd package name here.
Resolves #183
My (slightly modified from what's currently pushed) branch for wildfly/wildfly#18227 passes, both when pointing at an existing WildFly Preview build via -Djboss.home=/the/path and when using -Dversion.org.wildfly.wildfly=34.0.0.Beta1-SNAPSHOT and provisioning a server with the proposed 'jakarta-layer' layer.