You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
During the last phase of tests, there was an occurrence of not being able to relay a transaction because the minimum fee was not met.
Since it is not clear where the rounding/estimation issue comes from (not clear if #1132 or else), we agreed that if after a quick further investigation the origin is still unknown, we will go with a temporary patch for v7, i.e. either using 1.1 sats/vb as a multiplier when 1 sats/vb is selected or adding 10 sats to the total fee amount if 1 sats/vb was selected. This should give some margin (at a small cost) to avoid that the user is not able to relay the transaction. In such case, a more detailed fix would then be released in a followup.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
74a53ba spend: add 10 sats to fee for 1 sat/vb txs (Michael Mallan)
Pull request description:
This is a quick change to address #1322.
It adds 10 sats to the fee for a non-replacement transaction targeted at 1 sat/vb.
ACKs for top commit:
darosior:
utACK 74a53ba. Looking forward to a real fix.
Tree-SHA512: c8ef2a49be67b94c2198a246a82f92f16661308151540197a7831a06e1eca277fa3dafe733b53a97dc3c9fc6639f4b724237863f186e4ffeb0bf61c74a1e9c0b
Marking as done for v7 since a temporary hack has been applied for this release in #1323. But leaving open as we should pin down the root cause of this issue.
During the last phase of tests, there was an occurrence of not being able to relay a transaction because the minimum fee was not met.
Since it is not clear where the rounding/estimation issue comes from (not clear if #1132 or else), we agreed that if after a quick further investigation the origin is still unknown, we will go with a temporary patch for v7, i.e. either using 1.1 sats/vb as a multiplier when 1 sats/vb is selected or adding 10 sats to the total fee amount if 1 sats/vb was selected. This should give some margin (at a small cost) to avoid that the user is not able to relay the transaction. In such case, a more detailed fix would then be released in a followup.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: