You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I've got a genome and a fastq file with Nanopore reads. It seems that the splitting into 2 fake mate pairs doesn't work, I'm getting 2 empty files with fakemates_1.fq and fakemates_2.fq, it then proceeds to index the genome alright with bwa index, makes a tiny bam file and then fails with:
./mysmissv.sh
./mysmissv.sh: line 94: 11340 Segmentation fault $bindir/smis_shred -rlength $fakelen -step $step -minlen $minlen $fqfile fakemates_1.fastq fakemates_2.fastq >> $outp
./mysmissv.sh: line 143: 11429 Segmentation fault $bindir/smis_sort bwa_sorted.bam &>> outp
wc: path/to/dir/tempWork/genome-matepair-*: No such file or directory
in files.txt: smalt (bwa) data line should be <filename> <insert size> <standard deviation> <weight> <read length> <orientation, must = "in" | "out">
mv: cannot stat ‘spinner-sp2b.fasta’: No such file or directory
Scaffolds are in spinner_scaffolds.fasta
Summary of parameters used are in /path/to/dir/logs/launchedas_1529497860.txt
Log is in /path/to/dir/logs/output_1529497860.txt
(path names anonymised)
The log output_1529497860.txt states:
Dear Francesca
I've got a genome and a fastq file with Nanopore reads. It seems that the splitting into 2 fake mate pairs doesn't work, I'm getting 2 empty files with fakemates_1.fq and fakemates_2.fq, it then proceeds to index the genome alright with bwa index, makes a tiny bam file and then fails with:
(path names anonymised)
The log output_1529497860.txt states:
################## Running Output ##################
Creating fake-mate pairs from long read fastq file
Preparing Reference Fasta file
Aligning Fake-Mate Pairs to References with BWA:
[bwa_index] Pack FASTA... 0.42 sec
[bwa_index] Construct BWT for the packed sequence...
[BWTIncCreate] textLength=81105476, availableWord=17706840
[BWTIncConstructFromPacked] 10 iterations done. 29207572 characters processed.
[BWTIncConstructFromPacked] 20 iterations done. 53956932 characters processed.
[BWTIncConstructFromPacked] 30 iterations done. 75950212 characters processed.
[bwa_index] 23.12 seconds elapse.
[bwa_index] Update BWT... 0.25 sec
[bwa_index] Pack forward-only FASTA... 0.26 sec
[bwa_index] Construct SA from BWT and Occ... 14.46 sec
[bwt_gen] Finished constructing BWT in 33 iterations.
[main] Version: 0.7.12-r1039
[main] CMD: /scratch/software/bwa-0.7.12/bwa index genome.fasta
[main] Real time: 38.488 sec; CPU: 38.512 sec
[M::bwa_idx_load_from_disk] read 0 ALT contigs
[main] Version: 0.7.12-r1039
[main] CMD: /scratch/software/bwa-0.7.12/bwa mem -t 25 -T 50 -A 2 -O -1 -E -1 -B -1 genome.fasta fakemates_1.fastq fakemates_2.fastq
[main] Real time: 0.070 sec; CPU: 0.072 sec
################## Scaffolding ... ##################
.
The launchedas log launchedas_1529497860.txt states:
################# Settings Used for Running ##################
export MYSMISDIR=/scratch/software/smis
fasta file of assembly to scaffold
fafile=/some/file/path/to/fungus_draft_assembly.fasta
fastq file with long reads
fqfile=/some/file/path/to/fungus_trimmed.fastq
working directory
odir=/path/to/dir
##bin directory: where the executables are
bindir=$MYSMISDIR/smissv-bin
#which samtools
mysamtools=
which samtools
running mode
debug=1
########### FAKE-MATES PARAMETERS: ###########
min length of long reads
minlen=3000
length of fake mates
fakelen=2000
distance between one fake mate pairs and the next
step=200
########### ALIGNMENT PARAMETERS: ###########
which aligner to use (bwa, smalt)
aligner=bwa
bwa
mybwa=
which bwa
smalt
mysmalt=
which smalt
max threads:
nodes=25
minimum smith-waterman alignment score to report a hit
mapscore=50
Alignment scores and penalties
match=2
subst=-1
gapopen=-1
gapext=-1
########### SCAFFOLDING PARAMETERS: ###########
minimum numbers of edges:
min_edge=5.0
num_sigma=
awk "BEGIN {print ($min_edge)/2.5}"
(Paths to files and filenames anonymised.)
Are there any other logs I should have found?
The E.coli test completed fine.
Kind regards and many thanks,
Anne
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: