-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 13
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Interaction in group setting #8
Comments
Hi, |
I see, thanks for the info. I was looking at a situation with a group level continuous moderator. Do you know if there is any specific reason, group level-moderators are not allowed? |
font{
line-height: 1.6;
}
ul,ol{
padding-left: 20px;
list-style-position: inside;
}
Hi. I don't catch up what your "group level continuous" moderator means here. Do you mean you have several ordered groups, such as "less than 10", "10 to 20" and "larger than 20", and you treat them as the moderator?
font{
line-height: 1.6;
}
Ziyi Liu (刘子毅)Predoctoral Fellow at The University of Chicago Center in BeijingEPIC-ChinaTel: +86 18942900149
On 3/17/2021 ***@***.***> wrote:
I see, thanks for the info. I was looking at a situation with a group level continuous moderator.
Do you know if there is any specific reason, group level-moderators are not allowed?
—You are receiving this because you commented.Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe.
|
I'm sorry, let me be more clear. I am interested in the interaction between a group level moderator and an individual level covariate. You could also call it a cross-level interaction. |
Thank you for the great package.
It is possible to compute non-linear interaction effects between treatments and a group-level moderator?
Currently, both inter.raw and interflex only produce the error message:
"Can't subset columns that don't exist.
x Location 2 doesn't exist.
ℹ There are only 1 column."
Using version 1.1.3
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: