You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
While reading the papers on CARLA and DCDetector, I noticed that the reported results on the same datasets using identical testing methods differ significantly. For example, the reported F1 score of MSL 22.7 vs 96.6 which is not acceptable. Could you explain why this paper does not directly report the results of DCDetector? Also, were the results presented in this paper derived after applying any procedures or adjustments that were not explicitly mentioned in the text?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
While reading the papers on CARLA and DCDetector, I noticed that the reported results on the same datasets using identical testing methods differ significantly. For example, the reported F1 score of MSL 22.7 vs 96.6 which is not acceptable. Could you explain why this paper does not directly report the results of DCDetector? Also, were the results presented in this paper derived after applying any procedures or adjustments that were not explicitly mentioned in the text?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: