Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

proposal: accept unnamed streams #4

Open
cristianvasquez opened this issue Feb 23, 2023 · 0 comments
Open

proposal: accept unnamed streams #4

cristianvasquez opened this issue Feb 23, 2023 · 0 comments

Comments

@cristianvasquez
Copy link
Contributor

Currently, the service expects a carml:streamName "stdin" like this:

	rml:logicalSource [
		rml:source [
			a carml:Stream;
			carml:streamName "stdin"
		];
		rml:referenceFormulation ql:JSONPath;
		rml:iterator "$.characters[*]"
	];

If the name is not specified, the service returns 400.

However, CARML does not make this mandatory. Also, carml-jar expects stream-sources without streamName when processing through stdin

It would be nice if the service accepted mappings without streamName (and 'stdin' for backward compatibility)

Motivation: to make simpler CARML mappings, documentation, and XRM mappings. Also would be no mistmatch between carml-jar mappings and the ones that the service expects.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant