Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

"Name" and "Synced" tabs do nothing #98

Open
skibitsky opened this issue Sep 5, 2019 · 3 comments
Open

"Name" and "Synced" tabs do nothing #98

skibitsky opened this issue Sep 5, 2019 · 3 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@skibitsky
Copy link

The list is always still the same.

And in general, it isn't clear what these tabs do. "Synced" may show only synced apps on the left, but what does "Name" stand for? Or is it sorting in alphabetic vs synced--non-synced order?

Syncalicious 2019-09-05 at 12 20 05

@zenangst
Copy link
Owner

zenangst commented Sep 5, 2019

Hey @skibitsky, I can see how this can be confusing but it actually does work as intended.
Sorting on synced means that all applications that you have selected as synced will appear first in the list. Perhaps the ordering view should be hidden if there aren't any synched apps?

@skibitsky
Copy link
Author

In my opinion, the problem is that you use "Tabs" visual element as for sorting. I propose you to go with something similar to how Finder sorts list's elements or 1Password if it is not enough space for Finder approach.

Finder:
Finder 2019-09-09 at 13 30 26@2x

1Password:
1Password 2019-09-09 at 13 29 33@2x

@zenangst
Copy link
Owner

zenangst commented Sep 9, 2019

@skibitsky you mean a segmented control, I like the 1Password approach. That one can convey even more information, like the total count of applications etc. I think I'm gonna give the one a try and see how it goes, thanks for sharing! ❤️

@zenangst zenangst added the enhancement New feature or request label Sep 11, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants