You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
April has pointed out - rightly so - that Product "menus" on Convene look "haphazard" because we don't allow sorting or categorization. Fortunately, @zspencer's implementation of #2189 laid a strong foundation for improving organization of product pages.
✅ DECISION: As a first step, let's implement the capability for Marketplace administrators to group Products under sections (err...menus, aisles, taxonomy pending...).
During spirited text-based Discord task planning, there was first some temptation to consider a separate model for Product Section with a many association to tags. This way Marketplace admins could manage these sections via a typical CRUD-y workflow, similar to managing other entities like Tags, Tax Rates, or Products. However, @anaulin encouraged us to consider enhancing Tags themselves without introducing any new entity relationships. Because tags and taxonomies are user-generated the use cases across customers will inherently evolve to be nuanced, various, and non-linear. In other words, hard to predict from our vantage point. Ultimately we hoist a strong risk if we design a rigid relationship structure into the data model from the start.
✅ DECISION: After some deliberation, @anaulin proposed a (most reasonable) minimum set of requirements we need to deliver to support grouping of tags in sections on the page. Let's do these, show them to April, and start the feedback loop quickly.
Phase 1
A person can mark a tag as a "section"
We can retrieve a list of products that belong to a "section"
We can retrieve a list of all the "section" tags
Phase 2
A person can (re)order sections by drag and drop
Further development tasks/considerations:
Tag will be extended with a boolean field like is_section
Show a checkbox in the Add/Edit Tag UIs
Tags should be sortable (we use ranked-model)
Default section sort is by alpha
[ ]
🔮 Considerations for the future:
Adding the concept of a TagGroup or TagCollection would be necessary if we have a reason to display all the tags for a single group, or inversely all the groups of a single tag.
This could be a achieve with polymorphism (TagGroupable) although it won't be necessary if we only have a Tas and TagGroups
In this data model there's the possibility of needing to restrict certain tags (or all?) to be belong to one group
April's ask from email thread with Zinc & Co11ectiva
Back end function ask: Currently the menu order for Oakalandia looks haphazard.
I'd like to be able to drag and reorder based on categories like Beverage, Lunch, Breakfast
A few catering menu items for Oaklandia have options for add ons ( see attached example)
A few catering menu items are priced as a range. In cases we entered the higher amount but need to ask Oaklandia about that or > include verbiage to clarify
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Use Cases
Marketplace::Product
'sMarketplace::MenuGroup
Marketplace
: Finding aProduct
toOrder
#2378Execution Plan
April has pointed out - rightly so - that Product "menus" on Convene look "haphazard" because we don't allow sorting or categorization. Fortunately, @zspencer's implementation of #2189 laid a strong foundation for improving organization of product pages.
✅ DECISION: As a first step, let's implement the capability for Marketplace administrators to group Products under sections (err...menus, aisles, taxonomy pending...).
During spirited text-based Discord task planning, there was first some temptation to consider a separate model for Product Section with a many association to tags. This way Marketplace admins could manage these sections via a typical CRUD-y workflow, similar to managing other entities like Tags, Tax Rates, or Products. However, @anaulin encouraged us to consider enhancing
Tags
themselves without introducing any new entity relationships. Because tags and taxonomies are user-generated the use cases across customers will inherently evolve to be nuanced, various, and non-linear. In other words, hard to predict from our vantage point. Ultimately we hoist a strong risk if we design a rigid relationship structure into the data model from the start.✅ DECISION: After some deliberation, @anaulin proposed a (most reasonable) minimum set of requirements we need to deliver to support grouping of tags in sections on the page. Let's do these, show them to April, and start the feedback loop quickly.
Phase 1
Phase 2
Further development tasks/considerations:
Tag
will be extended with aboolean
field likeis_section
ranked-model
)🔮 Considerations for the future:
TagGroup
orTagCollection
would be necessary if we have a reason to display all the tags for a single group, or inversely all the groups of a single tag.TagGroupable
) although it won't be necessary if we only have a Tas and TagGroupsApril's ask from email thread with Zinc & Co11ectiva
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: