-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 27
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Create tumor/normal pairs with CNVs #76
Comments
We have also tested neat with CNVs in VCF format like this:
However, golden VCF file was empty |
Greetings, It has been on my todo list to facilitate different representations for input SVs, but at the moment only the standard REF/ALT format is supported. So any SV needs to be boiled down to its constituent insertions/deletions. E.g. if you wanted to have a large duplication it would have to be formatted: -Zach |
Thank you so much! |
Hi,
We are currently trying to use NEAT-genreads in order to generate realistic WGS/WES tumor and normal samples.
genReadsTumorTutorial is very clear, and we were able to generate both somatic and germline SNPs, but we are not sure how to generate somatic CNVs in tumor sample.
We would like to perform benchmark of CNV callers. Here: #30 it is mentioned that the
-v
parameter should be used in order to include CNVs.Most of the CNV callers do not use VCF format, and report CNVs in BED format (most commonly like in the example below)
What would be the recommended representation of CNVs?
Great tool!
Thank you,
Ana
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: