Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Simplify withdrawals logic #16

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Apr 18, 2024
Merged

Conversation

Nashtare
Copy link
Contributor

@Nashtare Nashtare force-pushed the withdrawals branch 5 times, most recently from 3f34c46 to cf771a4 Compare April 17, 2024 23:34
@Nashtare Nashtare self-assigned this Apr 17, 2024
@Nashtare
Copy link
Contributor Author

Hmm I have no idea why the CI is failing to kick off though 🤔

@Nashtare Nashtare changed the title Withdrawals Simplify withdrawals logic Apr 17, 2024
@muursh muursh mentioned this pull request Apr 18, 2024
@muursh
Copy link
Contributor

muursh commented Apr 18, 2024

Lol, I've just opened this and seen that you did CI stuff here. #17 is probably superfluous

@Nashtare
Copy link
Contributor Author

It's fine we can merge it and I'll pull :) I was also bothered by the cI typo

@Nashtare Nashtare requested review from muursh and BGluth April 18, 2024 12:44
Copy link
Contributor

@muursh muursh left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm :)

txn_ir[1].trie_roots_after.state_root = final_trie_state.state.hash();
}
}
last_inputs.withdrawals = withdrawals;
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'll be honest this made me double take at first

@Nashtare Nashtare merged commit 106591c into 0xPolygonZero:main Apr 18, 2024
3 checks passed
@Nashtare Nashtare deleted the withdrawals branch April 18, 2024 13:38
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants